K. D. Ewing and John Hendy QC | The Politics of Labour Law in the European Court of Human Rights

9 Jan 2018 | Judicial Power and the Left, Publications

The objection to the courts on the labour left is based on the nature of law and the nature of the interests served by law. In common law systems, the judges are rule-makers and are indulged to a great extent as authors of the law, including a great deal of private...

Chris Bickerton | The Left’s Journey from Politics to Law

9 Jan 2018 | Judicial Power and the Left, Publications

The political foundation of law In his great work, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, originally published in 1939 on the eve of the Second World War, E.H. Carr discussed at length the relationship between law and politics. His purpose was to explain why conflicts in...

Helen Thompson | Returning to Democracy: The British Left and the Constitutional Temptation of the European Union

9 Jan 2018 | Judicial Power and the Left, Publications

For a long time, many on the left were democratically suspicious of the European Economic Community (EEC), and its successor, the European Community (EC). As the primary organised expression of the left, the post-war Labour Party was dominated by those who wanted to...

Richard Tuck | Constitutional Restraints and Radical Politics

9 Jan 2018 | Judicial Power and the Left, Publications

In the months after the US election last November, I often found myself arguing against people in America who thought that Trump and Brexit were the same phenomenon. On my view, Brexit was in fact an innoculation against Trump and the politics of the radical right....

Gerald N. Rosenberg | Protecting Privilege: The Historic Role of the U.S. Supreme Court and the Great Progressive Misunderstanding

9 Jan 2018 | Judicial Power and the Left, Publications

Introduction What role can courts play in furthering progressive social change? In the view of many lawyers, human rights activists, and left-leaning political activists, courts offer a golden pathway to justice and equality. In their view, courts can uphold rights...

Chye-Ching Huang and Brian Highsmith | Progressive Politics and the Courts: Lessons from the United States

9 Jan 2018 | Judicial Power and the Left, Publications

US Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black characterised courts as “havens of refuge for those who might otherwise suffer because they are helpless, weak, [or] outnumbered …”.  This appealing view of the judiciary — as a reliable guardian of minority rights, and an...

Jane Kelsey | The Crisis of Legitimacy in International Investment Agreements and Investor-State Dispute Settlement

9 Jan 2018 | Judicial Power and the Left, Publications

In the thirty years since the World Trade Organisation (WTO) was established, international economic agreements have intruded ever deeper into states’ regulatory and judicial domain, to the point that they now face a multi-faceted backlash. The popular discontent that...

Human Rights and Political Wrongs: A new approach to Human Rights law

12 Dec 2017 | Human Rights and Political Wrongs, Publications

In Human Rights and Political Wrongs, one of the UK’s most eminent historians of ideas offers a powerful critique of the existing system of human rights law, and an original analysis of the fundamental principles on which any such law should be based. As Noel Malcolm...

Timothy Endicott: The Stubborn Stain Theory of Executive Power

7 Sep 2017 | Publications

In November 2016, days before the Supreme Court hearing in the Miller case, Professor Timothy Endicott (University of Oxford) delivered a lecture for Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project on the royal prerogative. Reflecting its weight and importance, the lecture...

Carol Harlow: Administrative Justice and the Parliament Square Axis

4 Sep 2017 | Publications

Download paper Introduction This paper concerns the judicialisation of administrative justice and is prompted by a recent decision of the UK Supreme Court. The case arose in the context of housing, but for these purposes is relevant insofar as it raises critical...

Gunnar Beck: EU citizens’ rights after Brexit: The EU’s extravagant demands for extra-territorial jurisdiction by the CJEU and reverse discrimination

18 Jun 2017 | Brexit and Judicial Power, Posts, Publications: Brexit and Judicial Power

Download pdf The tremors caused by the general election are still working their way through the political system. The implications for the nature of the UK’s future relationship with the EU have been the subject of much speculation. Before too long, however, the...

Derogation from the European Convention on Human Rights in Armed Conflict: Submission to the JCHR

27 Apr 2017 | Publications, Publications: Brexit and Judicial Power

Download paper Submission to the Joint Committee on Human Rights 7 April 2017 Dr Jonathan Morgan, Senior Lecturer in Law, University of Cambridge Professor Richard Ekins, Associate Professor, University of Oxford Professor Guglielmo Verdirame, Professor of...

Daniel Greenberg: Judicial Ignorance of the Parliamentary Process: Implications for Statutory Interpretation

27 Mar 2017 | Posts, Publications, Publications: Critiquing Judicial Power

Judges do not understand enough about the parliamentary process to be able to make sense of many of the materials they are required to handle, including the text of Acts of Parliament and subordinate legislation. The starting point for the paper is the increasing...

Farrah Ahmed: Strategy and Subterfuge? Assessing the ‘New’ Judicial Power

2 Feb 2017 | ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism, Posts, Publications: ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism

Part of our series on “Debating Judicial Power: Papers from the ALBA Summer Conference”. In his new paper, Richard Ekins offers an ambitious and wide-ranging narrative of judicial power. He argues that a ‘new understanding’ of judicial power is ascendant. He seeks to...

Richard Ekins: The Dynamics of Judicial Power

1 Feb 2017 | ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism, Posts, Publications: ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism

Judicial power in the new UK constitution is on the rise.  This is hardly a remarkable claim: Lord Neuberger and Lady Hale, for example, each take the expansion of judicial power to be an undeniable feature of the change over time in our governing arrangements.  In a...

Mikołaj Barczentewicz: The Core Issue in Miller: The Relevance of Section 1 of the 1972 Act

4 Jan 2017 | Brexit and Judicial Power, Posts, Publications, Publications: Brexit and Judicial Power

Download paper The legal controversy in the Miller case may now be distilled in the following way. The government argues that it has a general power to withdraw from treaties, which it certainly does. The claimants argue that the executive does not have a power to...

Maya Lester: The “Rogue” European Court in the Campaign for Brexit

15 Dec 2016 | ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism, Posts, Publications, Publications: ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism

In the third part of our series on Debating Judicial Power: Papers from the ALBA Summer Conference, Maya Lester QC from Brick Court Chambers writes on ‘The “Rogue” European Court in the Campaign for Brexit’. With debate about judicial activism playing a...

Christopher Forsyth: Who is the ultimate guardian of the constitution?

13 Dec 2016 | ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism, Posts, Publications, Publications: ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism

Part of our series on “Debating Judicial Power: Papers from the ALBA Summer Conference”. A pdf version of this post can be found here. 1. Sir John Laws writes, whether on or off the bench, with brilliance and brio. He presents an apparently utterly persuasive account...

Sir John Laws: Judicial Activism

12 Dec 2016 | ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism, Posts, Publications, Publications: ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism

Download John Laws paper Christopher Forsyth reply In the second part of our series on Debating Judicial Power: Papers from the ALBA Summer Conference, Sir John Laws, who served from 1999-2016 as a Lord Justice of Appeal, shares his thoughts on “Judicial Activism”,...

John Finnis: Brexit and the Balance of Our Constitution

2 Dec 2016 | Posts, Publications, Publications: Brexit and Judicial Power, Publications: Critiquing Judicial Power

Following on from his three Judicial Power Project papers on Miller, Professor John Finnis delivered the Sir Thomas More Lecture at Lincoln’s Inn on ‘Brexit and the Balance of Our Constitution’, on 1 December 2016. The lecture provided powerful...

Timothy Endicott: Parliament and the Prerogative: From the Case of Proclamations to Miller

1 Dec 2016 | Brexit and Judicial Power, Posts, Publications, Publications: Brexit and Judicial Power

The Government’s argument in the Miller case is that triggering Article 50 lies within the power of the Crown to make and unmake international treaties – a power the leading litigant, Gina Miller, has termed ‘this ancient, secretive Royal...

John Finnis: Two Too Many?

24 Nov 2016 | ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism, Posts, Publications, Publications: ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism, Publications: Critiquing Judicial Power

Part of our series on “Debating Judicial Power: Papers from the ALBA Summer Conference”. A pdf version of this post can be found here. These brief marginal comments on Dame Elisabeth Laing’s interesting, important, and enviably readable “shop floor” reflections in her...

Elisabeth Laing: Two Cheers for Judicial Activism

22 Nov 2016 | ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism, Posts, Publications, Publications: ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism

Download Elisabeth Laing paper John Finnis reply Today we launch this series with a paper by High Court judge Dame Elisabeth Laing entitled ‘Two Cheers for Judicial Activism’. The premise of the paper is that ‘there is a thing, which for want of a better label, we can...

John Finnis: Terminating Treaty-based UK Rights: A Supplementary Note

2 Nov 2016 | Brexit and Judicial Power, Publications, Publications: Brexit and Judicial Power

This post is excerpted from a second short paper published today, available here: Download paper In a Judicial Power Project paper of 26 October, Terminating Treaty-based UK Rights, I argued that UK law and constitutional practice about double tax treaties provides a...

John Finnis: Terminating Treaty-based UK Rights

26 Oct 2016 | Brexit and Judicial Power, Publications, Publications: Brexit and Judicial Power

This post is excerpted from a short paper published today, available here: Download paper Oral argument in the Brexit Case in the Administrative Court last week left an easy case looking a bit difficult.  It allowed Lord Pannick QC, for the lead claimant, to reiterate...

Rights after Brexit: Submission to the JCHR

20 Oct 2016 | Publications, Publications: Brexit and Judicial Power

Download pdf Submission to the Joint Committee on Human Rights 10 October 2016 Gunnar Beck, 1 Essex Court, former advisor to the European Scrutiny Committee of the House of Commons Dominic Burbidge, Research Fellow, Judicial Power Project Richard Ekins, Associate...

Brexit and Judicial Power

21 Jul 2016 | Posts, Publications, Publications: Brexit and Judicial Power

Professor Richard Ekins publishes a new Judical Power Project report on Brexit’s wide implications for the future of judicial power in our constitution. Read the report...

Jason Varuhas: Judicial Capture of Political Accountability

6 Jun 2016 | Posts, Publications: Critiquing Judicial Power, Varuhas on Judicial Review and Political Accountability

In a Policy Exchange report released today I examine the increasing capture of political accountability mechanisms by courts. Institutions such as the Parliamentary Ombudsman are intended to operate in the political sphere, securing government accountability through...

Judicial Capture of Political Accountability

6 Jun 2016 | Publications

Download report Judicial Capture of Political Accountability examines the increasing capture of political accountability mechanisms by courts. It focuses upon developments in judicial review of the Ombudsman process, and shows how these developments are emblematic of...

Judging the Public Interest: The rule of law vs. the rule of courts

3 Dec 2015 | Publications, Publications: Critiquing Judicial Power

Download report The judiciary is guilty of overreaching its constitutional remit by overruling Ministers’ decisions whether to release material not deemed to be in the public interest. In Judging the Public Interest, Prof Richard Ekins (University of Oxford) and Prof...