Judicial Power and the Balance of Our Constitution

This collection reflects on the place of judicial power in the common law constitutional tradition. It is framed around two lectures by John Finnis.

Read More

Judicial Power and the Left: Notes on a Sceptical Tradition

In this collection of short essays, leading political and legal thinkers reflect on the left’s traditional scepticism towards expansive judicial power.

Read More

Human Rights and Political Wrongs: A new approach to Human Rights law

One of the UK’s most eminent historians of ideas offers a powerful critique of the existing system of human rights law, and an original analysis of the fundamental principles on which any such law should be based.

Read More

EU Citizens' Rights after Brexit

Gunnar Beck on the EU’s extravagant demands for extra-territorial jurisdiction by the CJEU and reverse discrimination

Read More

Miller Supreme Court Judgment: Expert Reactions

11 leading academics and legal practitioners comment

Read More

The Miller Majority: Reliant on European Perspectives and Counsel's Failings

Professor John Finnis on how the Supreme Court misread the ECA

Read More
Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project submits evidence to Joint Committee on Human Rights inquiry on the 20th anniversary of the Human Rights Act 1998

Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project submits evidence to Joint Committee on Human Rights inquiry on the 20th anniversary of the Human Rights Act 1998

Richard Ekins (University of Oxford and Head of the Judicial Power Project) and Graham Gee (University of Sheffield) have submitted written evidence to the inquiry by Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights on 20 Years of the Human Rights Act. Download our submission or read online via Parliament’s website.

read more

Latest tweets

The Inner House of the Court of Session in Scotland acted wrongly in referring to the Court of Justice of the EU th… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

About 3 weeks ago · reply · retweet · favorite

Follow us