Intimidation as Foreign Policy

Intimidation as Foreign Policy

How Mauritius has attemted to criminalise UK sovereignty over the Chagos Islands In 2021, Mauritius enacted a law which criminalises “misrepresenting the sovereignty of Mauritius over any part of its territory”, part of its long-running campaign against Britain’s...
Upholding Standards; Unsettling Conventions

Upholding Standards; Unsettling Conventions

Upholding Standards; Unsettling Conventions argues that proposals for a statutory role for the Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests and putting the Ministerial Code on a legal footing would give rise to serious constitutional questions and carry substantial...
Sovereignty and Security in the Indian Ocean

Sovereignty and Security in the Indian Ocean

This paper makes the urgent case for the Government not to cede control of the Chagos Islands.  In November 2022, the Foreign Secretary announced that the UK was entering into negotiations with Mauritius about the exercise of sovereignty over the British Indian...
What do we want from the King’s Speech?

What do we want from the King’s Speech?

What do we want from the King’s Speech?’ sets out an ambitious programme of 14 new laws that the Government should announce in the King’s Speech – for what will be the last Parliamentary Session before the general election. Proposals put forward by Policy Exchange...
Reversing the Supreme Court’s judgment in R v Adams

Reversing the Supreme Court’s judgment in R v Adams

In 2020, the Supreme Court allowed Gerry Adams’s appeal against his conviction, in 1975, for attempting to escape from lawful custody.  The judgment was a bad mistake and opened the door for Gerry Adams and others wrongly to sue for compensation for their detention. ...
Rule 39 and the Rule of Law

Rule 39 and the Rule of Law

This report considers the legal status of “interim measures” that are indicated by (a single judge of) the European Court of Human Rights under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court.  Many lawyers and jurists argue that failure to comply with a Rule 39 measure would...
Government by proclamation? A symposium

Government by proclamation? A symposium

The events of recent years have brought into sharp focus the relationship between government and Parliament, with many jurists lamenting the former’s dominance of the latter.  The balance of powers within the political constitution is a matter of the highest...
Physician-Assisted Suicide

Physician-Assisted Suicide

A new report by Policy Exchange slams the ‘flawed’ Parliamentary debate on assisted dying and urges Parliament to show caution and restraint in this matter. Written by Professor John Keown, one of the world’s leading ethicists, the report warns that the law in Canada...
How to legislate about small boats

How to legislate about small boats

New legislation is needed to give effect to a policy that persons who arrive (or attempt to arrive) in the UK unlawfully on a small boat will be removed from the UK and will never be allowed to settle here. There is a strong risk that legislation will be proposed...
Government by proclamation? A symposium

Amending the Public Order Bill

The Public Order Bill is an important opportunity to reform the law relating to protest and thus to restore public order to our streets. The Bill as introduced created several new offences which were likely to prove unworkable because they had a “reasonable excuse”...
Between Law and Politics

Between Law and Politics

This report considers the constitutional role of the Law Officers and defends the institutional status quo. The current configuration of the Attorney General (and Solicitor General), as a law officer with legal and political dimensions, works well. Moving to an...
The Scottish Gender Recognition Reform Bill

The Scottish Gender Recognition Reform Bill

This report demonstrates that the Scottish National Party’s (SNP) Gender Recognition Reform Bill, which aims to change the law regulating legal sex change for those born or resident in Scotland, will fundamentally alter the law relating to equal opportunities across...
From the Channel to Rwanda

From the Channel to Rwanda

The government’s Rwanda plan has been roundly denounced by the leaders of the main Christian churches in Britain.  Notably, the Archbishop of Canterbury devoted his Easter sermon to the subject and the Lords Spiritual have jointly attacked the Rwanda plan in the...
Interveners and Depoliticise Our Courts

Interveners and Depoliticise Our Courts

In a new paper for Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project, Anthony Speaight KC argues for reform of the judicial practice of permitting pressure groups to intervene in litigation.  The paper, which is welcomed by Lord Wolfson of Tredegar KC, recommends legislation...
How Not to Legislate About Begging and Rough Sleeping

How Not to Legislate About Begging and Rough Sleeping

The Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill is to be considered again by the Public Bill Committee on 13 October 2022.  One of the few clauses of the Bill yet to be considered is clause 187, which replaces provisions of the Vagrancy Act 1824 about begging and rough...
Reversing the Supreme Court’s judgment in R v Adams

The Limits of Judicial Power

A programme of constitutional reform Parliament and Government have a responsibility to maintain the balance of powers within our constitution. The Government should adopt a programme of constitutional reform that will restate and buttress the traditional limits on...
Crossing the Line?

Crossing the Line?

The Attorney General and the Law/Politics Divide This paper defends the legitimacy of the Attorney General’s decision to offer public remarks on judicial review and rejects the characterisation that they pushed impermissibly at the boundaries of her office. The paper...
Bright Lines, Sexual Exploitation and Appellate Adjudication

Bright Lines, Sexual Exploitation and Appellate Adjudication

A Right to Sex? In a widely read piece in the London Review of Books, and more expansively in a new book, Amia Srinivasan explored whether there is a “right to sex”. The issue, as her discussion shows, is predictably complicated and politically charged. But it is...
Government by proclamation? A symposium

How to Improve the Judicial Review and Courts Bill

The Lord Chancellor introduced the Judicial Review and Courts Bill to Parliament on 21st July this year. This paper, which draws on submissions to the Independent Review of Administrative Law and the Government Consultation on Judicial Review Reform, sets out a number...
Unlicensed law reformer? Lady Hale and the law of surrogacy

Unlicensed law reformer? Lady Hale and the law of surrogacy

Introduction The publication of Lady Hale’s memoirs is likely to prompt an assessment of her undeniably impressive judicial career. Given its title, Spider Woman: A Life, attention may focus on what Lady Hale has to say about her role in the Supreme Court...
The significance of the Supreme Court’s Begum judgment”

The significance of the Supreme Court’s Begum judgment”

In allowing the Home Secretary’s appeal in the Begum case, the Supreme Court has corrected a misconceived Court of Appeal judgment, which had put national security in doubt and undermined the law Parliament made.  The Supreme Court’s judgment is a powerful and...
Supreme Court Reform

Supreme Court Reform

In the wake of our August paper, Reforming the Supreme Court, Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project is pleased to publish a new symposium on Supreme Court reform, in which distinguished legal commentators engage with the question of how and by whom appellate...
Supreme Court Reform

Further thoughts on Supreme Court reform

In our recent paper, Reforming the Supreme Court, Professor Wyatt and I discussed the merits of his proposal to authorise changing panels of Court of Appeal judges to act as the apex appellate court.  I noted that my initial view had been that the proposal was too...
Supreme Court Reform

The problem of judicial diversity

  In Reforming the Supreme Court, Professor Wyatt and Professor Ekins have produced a thoughtful contribution to the ongoing scholarly debate on the correct limits to judicial power; a debate which is, and always has been, driven by political rather than legal...
Supreme Court Reform

Professor Wyatt’s proposal: a response

  The debate about the role of judiciary in our democracy, and in particular of the Supreme Court, will never be resolved to everyone’s satisfaction. At root, there is fundamental disagreement about the legitimate function of the judges under the British...