13 Jan 2016 | Debates, Ekins and Forsyth on Evans, Posts
Editor’s Note: Last month Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project published a report by Professors Richard Ekins and Christopher Forsyth on Judging the Public Interest: the Rule of Law vs the Rule of Courts. The Project invited comments on the paper from Professor...
11 Jan 2016 | Debates, Ekins and Forsyth on Evans, Posts
Editor’s Note: Last month Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project published a report by Professors Richard Ekins and Christopher Forsyth on Judging the Public Interest: the Rule of Law vs the Rule of Courts. The Project invited comments on the paper from Professor...
15 Dec 2015 | Debates, Ekins and Forsyth on Evans, Posts
Editor’s Note: Last week Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project published a report by Professors Richard Ekins and Christopher Forsyth on Judging the Public Interest: the Rule of Law vs the Rule of Courts. The Project has invited commentators with a range of views...
9 Dec 2015 | Debates, Ekins and Forsyth on Evans, Posts
Editor’s Note: Last week Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project published a report by Professors Richard Ekins and Christopher Forsyth on Judging the Public Interest: the Rule of Law vs the Rule of Courts. The Project has invited commentators with a range of views...
7 Dec 2015 | Debates, Ekins and Forsyth on Evans, Posts
Editor’s Note: Last week Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project published a report by Professors Richard Ekins and Christopher Forsyth on Judging the Public Interest: the Rule of Law vs the Rule of Courts. The Project has invited commentators with a range of views...
3 Dec 2015 | Debates, Ekins and Forsyth on Evans, Posts
In a Policy Exchange report released today, Professor Christopher Forsyth and I argue that the Supreme Court’s most important constitutional law decision this year was dangerously wrong. The case, Evans v Attorney General [2015] UKSC 21, concerned the Attorney...
