Judicial Power Project
  • Home
  • About
    • About the Project
    • People
  • Posts
    • In the Media
    • Series
      • Judicial Review and Judicial Independence
      • Human Rights and Political Wrongs
      • Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design
      • Legislated Rights
  • Debates
    • Debating the Supreme Court’s prorogation judgment
    • Commentary on Lord Sumption’s Reith Lectures
    • Finnis on Judicial Power
    • Ekins and Forsyth on Evans
    • Varuhas on Judicial Review and Political Accountability
    • Brexit and Judicial Power
    • ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism
  • Lawfare
    • Protecting Those Who Serve | Richard Ekins, Patrick Hennessey and Julie Marionneau
    • Clearing the Fog of Law: Saving our armed forces from defeat by judicial diktat
    • The Fog of Law: An introduction to the legal erosion of British fighting power
  • Publications
  • Events
Select Page
Christopher Forsyth: A change of mind on Bradley

Christopher Forsyth: A change of mind on Bradley

14 Jun 2016 | Posts, Varuhas on Judicial Review and Political Accountability

Editor’s Note: Last week Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project published a report by Dr Jason Varuhas on Judicial Capture of Political Accountability. The Project has invited commentators with a range of views to reply to the report. Some might be expected to be...
Farrah Ahmed: Deference to political accountability mechanisms

Farrah Ahmed: Deference to political accountability mechanisms

9 Jun 2016 | Posts, Varuhas on Judicial Review and Political Accountability

Editor’s Note: Earlier this week Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project published a report by Dr Jason Varuhas on Judicial Capture of Political Accountability. The Project has invited commentators with a range of views to reply to the report. Some might be expected...
Richard Ekins: A legitimacy crisis in judicial review

Richard Ekins: A legitimacy crisis in judicial review

8 Jun 2016 | Posts, Varuhas on Judicial Review and Political Accountability

Judicial review of executive action is a vital part of the rule of law. The courts rightly hold ministers and other public bodies to the scope of their lawful powers, insisting on procedural fairness and correcting some obvious abuses of power, but aiming always to...
Carol Harlow: A comment on Judicial Capture of Political Accountability

Carol Harlow: A comment on Judicial Capture of Political Accountability

8 Jun 2016 | Posts, Varuhas on Judicial Review and Political Accountability

Editor’s Note: Earlier this week Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project published a report by Dr Jason Varuhas on Judicial Capture of Political Accountability. The Project has invited commentators with a range of views to reply to the report. Some might be expected...
Richard Kirkham: A reply to Judicial Capture of Political Accountability

Richard Kirkham: A reply to Judicial Capture of Political Accountability

7 Jun 2016 | Posts, Varuhas on Judicial Review and Political Accountability

Editor’s Note: Earlier this week Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project published a report by Dr Jason Varuhas on Judicial Capture of Political Accountability. The Project has invited commentators with a range of views to reply to the report. Some might be expected...
Jason Varuhas: Judicial Capture of Political Accountability

Jason Varuhas: Judicial Capture of Political Accountability

6 Jun 2016 | Posts, Publications: Critiquing Judicial Power, Varuhas on Judicial Review and Political Accountability

In a Policy Exchange report released today I examine the increasing capture of political accountability mechanisms by courts. Institutions such as the Parliamentary Ombudsman are intended to operate in the political sphere, securing government accountability through...

The Judicial Power Project is brought to you by Policy Exchange

Contact Us
info@policyexchange.org.uk | 0207 340 2650 | Policy Exchange, 8 - 10 Great George St, Westminster, London, SW1P 3AE

  • Twitter
  • RSS

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress