Judicial Power Project
  • Home
  • About
    • About the Project
    • People
  • Posts
    • In the Media
    • Series
      • Judicial Review and Judicial Independence
      • Human Rights and Political Wrongs
      • Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design
      • Legislated Rights
  • Debates
    • Debating the Supreme Court’s prorogation judgment
    • Commentary on Lord Sumption’s Reith Lectures
    • Finnis on Judicial Power
    • Ekins and Forsyth on Evans
    • Varuhas on Judicial Review and Political Accountability
    • Brexit and Judicial Power
    • ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism
  • Lawfare
    • Protecting Those Who Serve | Richard Ekins, Patrick Hennessey and Julie Marionneau
    • Clearing the Fog of Law: Saving our armed forces from defeat by judicial diktat
    • The Fog of Law: An introduction to the legal erosion of British fighting power
  • Publications
  • Events
Select Page
Fair trials for terrorists: why the Court of Appeal was right to reject the view from Strasbourg

Fair trials for terrorists: why the Court of Appeal was right to reject the view from Strasbourg

26 Feb 2020 | News, Posts

In R. v Abdurahman [2019] EWCA Crim 2239, the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) (CA(CD)) robustly, yet politely, rejected the view of the ECtHR’s Grand Chamber that the appellant had, in breach of Art.6.1 of the ECHR, not received a fair Crown Court trial. It also...
Richard Ekins submits evidence to Defence Committee inquiry on protecting veterans

Richard Ekins submits evidence to Defence Committee inquiry on protecting veterans

25 Feb 2019 | News

Professor Richard Ekins, Head of the Judicial Power Project, has submitted evidence to the House of Commons Defence Committee’s inquiry into the question of how former service personnel can be protected from the spectre of investigation and re-investigation for...
Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project submits evidence to Joint Committee on Human Rights inquiry on the 20th anniversary of the Human Rights Act 1998

Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project submits evidence to Joint Committee on Human Rights inquiry on the 20th anniversary of the Human Rights Act 1998

22 Oct 2018 | News

Richard Ekins (University of Oxford and Head of the Judicial Power Project) and Graham Gee (University of Sheffield) have submitted written evidence to the inquiry by Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights on 20 Years of the Human Rights Act. Download our...
Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project submits evidence to Joint Committee on Human Rights inquiry on the 20th anniversary of the Human Rights Act 1998

Judicial Power Project submits evidence to Joint Committee on Human Rights inquiry

26 Feb 2018 | News

Representatives of Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project have submitted written evidence to the inquiry by Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights, Human Rights: Attitudes to Enforcement. The evidence was complied by Professor Richard Ekins, the...

The Judicial Power Project is brought to you by Policy Exchange

Contact Us
info@policyexchange.org.uk | 0207 340 2650 | Policy Exchange, 8 - 10 Great George St, Westminster, London, SW1P 3AE

  • Twitter
  • RSS

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress