Judicial Power Project
  • Home
  • About
    • About the Project
    • People
  • Posts
    • In the Media
    • Series
      • Judicial Review and Judicial Independence
      • Human Rights and Political Wrongs
      • Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design
      • Legislated Rights
  • Debates
    • Debating the Supreme Court’s prorogation judgment
    • Commentary on Lord Sumption’s Reith Lectures
    • Finnis on Judicial Power
    • Ekins and Forsyth on Evans
    • Varuhas on Judicial Review and Political Accountability
    • Brexit and Judicial Power
    • ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism
  • Lawfare
    • Protecting Those Who Serve | Richard Ekins, Patrick Hennessey and Julie Marionneau
    • Clearing the Fog of Law: Saving our armed forces from defeat by judicial diktat
    • The Fog of Law: An introduction to the legal erosion of British fighting power
  • Publications
  • Events
Select Page
The Author Responds | Paul Yowell

The Author Responds | Paul Yowell

29 Jan 2019 | Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design

I am enormously grateful to the distinguished judges and scholars who have read and engaged with my book Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design, and appreciate both the praise and criticism. In this reply I respond to some points they raise. As I write, news...
Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design: An online symposium on Paul Yowell’s new book

Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design: An online symposium on Paul Yowell’s new book

13 Dec 2018 | Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design

The global expansion of judicial power means that courts around the world are increasingly called on to settle matters of moral and political controversy, including assisted suicide, data privacy, anti-terrorism measures, marriage, and abortion. But doubts regarding...
Synopsis of Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design | Paul Yowell

Synopsis of Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design | Paul Yowell

13 Dec 2018 | Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design

Almost every country in the world has legislation that prohibits physician-assisted suicide. The UK Parliament voted overwhelmingly to maintain its prohibition of the practice in 2015 (330 to 118), but the law has been challenged in recent cases (Conway and...
Constitutional Tradeoffs | by Adrian Vermeule

Constitutional Tradeoffs | by Adrian Vermeule

13 Dec 2018 | Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design

Paul Yowell’s Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design is a superb book, with a kind of lapidary intelligence. I think it advances the conversation in two ways, methological and substantive. Methodologically, it pursues the comparative-institutional method,...
Responsible Choices about Constitutional Design | Richard Ekins

Responsible Choices about Constitutional Design | Richard Ekins

13 Dec 2018 | Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design

Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design is a wonderful book – full of riches, concise, tightly argued, and carefully interwoven.  It is itself a model of careful design as well as a study of the absence (or failure) of constitutional design and a prescription...
The Challenge of Integrating Theory and Practice| Professor Erin Delaney

The Challenge of Integrating Theory and Practice| Professor Erin Delaney

13 Dec 2018 | Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design

Sed quid custodes ipso custodiet? Who will guard the guardians? The question is not posed until nearly the end of this impressive new book, but it is clear from the outset that Paul Yowell is animated by a deep concern about the exercise of judicial power. He taps...
Institutional Incapacity and the Bounds of Judicial Power | Justice Malcolm Wallis

Institutional Incapacity and the Bounds of Judicial Power | Justice Malcolm Wallis

13 Dec 2018 | Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design

Do courts and judges have the institutional capacity needed to settle the kinds of morally and politically controversial issues that arise in constitutional rights cases? Paul Yowell argues that the institutional setting of a court is lacking in basic capacities for...
Courts as a Forum for Reviewing Empirical Data and Moral Reasons | Judge Ioannis Sarmas

Courts as a Forum for Reviewing Empirical Data and Moral Reasons | Judge Ioannis Sarmas

13 Dec 2018 | Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design

Ι Justice Scalia’s criticism of the ‘living Constitution’ interpretive theory highlighted the dangers facing the democratic process from the judicial approach whereby terms used in the Constitution are perceived, not in the sense they had when they were adopted, but...

The Judicial Power Project is brought to you by Policy Exchange

Contact Us
info@policyexchange.org.uk | 0207 340 2650 | Policy Exchange, 8 - 10 Great George St, Westminster, London, SW1P 3AE

  • Twitter
  • RSS

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress