Judicial Power Project
  • Home
  • About
    • About the Project
    • People
  • Posts
    • In the Media
    • Series
      • Judicial Review and Judicial Independence
      • Human Rights and Political Wrongs
      • Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design
      • Legislated Rights
  • Debates
    • Debating the Supreme Court’s prorogation judgment
    • Commentary on Lord Sumption’s Reith Lectures
    • Finnis on Judicial Power
    • Ekins and Forsyth on Evans
    • Varuhas on Judicial Review and Political Accountability
    • Brexit and Judicial Power
    • ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism
  • Lawfare
    • Protecting Those Who Serve | Richard Ekins, Patrick Hennessey and Julie Marionneau
    • Clearing the Fog of Law: Saving our armed forces from defeat by judicial diktat
    • The Fog of Law: An introduction to the legal erosion of British fighting power
  • Publications
  • Events
Select Page
Judicial Intervention in Parliamentary Proceedings

Judicial Intervention in Parliamentary Proceedings

19 Nov 2018 | Publications, Publications: Critiquing Judicial Power

The Inner House of the Court of Session in Scotland acted wrongly in referring to the Court of Justice of the EU the question of whether the UK can unilaterally revoke Article 50 and so remain in the EU. As the UK Supreme Court urgently considers the Government’s...
Daniel Greenberg: Judicial Ignorance of the Parliamentary Process: Implications for Statutory Interpretation

Daniel Greenberg: Judicial Ignorance of the Parliamentary Process: Implications for Statutory Interpretation

27 Mar 2017 | Posts, Publications, Publications: Critiquing Judicial Power

Judges do not understand enough about the parliamentary process to be able to make sense of many of the materials they are required to handle, including the text of Acts of Parliament and subordinate legislation. The starting point for the paper is the increasing...

John Finnis: Brexit and the Balance of Our Constitution

2 Dec 2016 | Posts, Publications, Publications: Brexit and Judicial Power, Publications: Critiquing Judicial Power

Following on from his three Judicial Power Project papers on Miller, Professor John Finnis delivered the Sir Thomas More Lecture at Lincoln’s Inn on ‘Brexit and the Balance of Our Constitution’, on 1 December 2016. The lecture provided powerful...
John Finnis: Two Too Many?

John Finnis: Two Too Many?

24 Nov 2016 | ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism, Posts, Publications, Publications: ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism, Publications: Critiquing Judicial Power

Part of our series on “Debating Judicial Power: Papers from the ALBA Summer Conference”. A pdf version of this post can be found here. These brief marginal comments on Dame Elisabeth Laing’s interesting, important, and enviably readable “shop floor” reflections in her...
Jason Varuhas: Judicial Capture of Political Accountability

Jason Varuhas: Judicial Capture of Political Accountability

6 Jun 2016 | Posts, Publications: Critiquing Judicial Power, Varuhas on Judicial Review and Political Accountability

In a Policy Exchange report released today I examine the increasing capture of political accountability mechanisms by courts. Institutions such as the Parliamentary Ombudsman are intended to operate in the political sphere, securing government accountability through...
Judging the Public Interest: The rule of law vs. the rule of courts

Judging the Public Interest: The rule of law vs. the rule of courts

3 Dec 2015 | Publications, Publications: Critiquing Judicial Power

Download report The judiciary is guilty of overreaching its constitutional remit by overruling Ministers’ decisions whether to release material not deemed to be in the public interest. In Judging the Public Interest, Prof Richard Ekins (University of Oxford) and Prof...
John Finnis – Judicial Power: Past, Present and Future

John Finnis – Judicial Power: Past, Present and Future

21 Oct 2015 | Finnis on Judicial Power, Publications, Publications: Critiquing Judicial Power

Below is the text of the speech delivered by Professor John Finnis FBA at the relaunch of Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project, with an introduction from Lord Chancellor Rt Hon Michael Gove MP and a Vote of Thanks from Rt Hon Lord Justice Elias, himself a...
Jeffrey Goldsworthy – Losing Faith in Democracy: Why judicial supremacy is rising and what to do about it

Jeffrey Goldsworthy – Losing Faith in Democracy: Why judicial supremacy is rising and what to do about it

9 Mar 2015 | Events, Past events, Publications, Publications: Critiquing Judicial Power

Below is a transcript of the speech delivered by Professor Jeffrey Goldsworthy at the launch of Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project. You can also download a copy of the speech in pdf format here. 1. INTRODUCTION I am honoured to have been invited to launch...

The Judicial Power Project is brought to you by Policy Exchange

Contact Us
info@policyexchange.org.uk | 0207 340 2650 | Policy Exchange, 8 - 10 Great George St, Westminster, London, SW1P 3AE

  • Twitter
  • RSS

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress